For Immediate Release - Sunday 7 November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
OVER 64% OF HOMES IN GLASGOW FACE HIGHER BILLS
LABOUR SPOKESPERSON DESCRIBES IT AS “DESIRABLE”
The SNP has warned that Labour’s plans for a new property tax – on top of their plan to increase the council tax – would leave families facing a bill of up to £500 more than they pay now and over 64% of properties in Glasgow would move up a band just like those Wales’ largest city Cardiff did in 2005 when Labour revalued the Council Tax.
Labour’s tax plans now include:
* Letting council tax increase again – which increased by 60% last time they were in power –a possible £172 over the 4 years of an Ian Gray administration if it went up by the same rate
* £3000 per family to pay for the spending black hole wishlist Labour published at their conference
* And now up to £500 extra in increases for nearly half of Scottish households if their scheme for a new property tax sees the light of day
The £500 property tax bombshell arises from Labour's firm commitment to introduce a new property tax - as announced by Michael McMahon at the Labour conference – which will dramatically impact on at least 750,000 households in Scotland as it would require a revaluation of current properties.
When this happened in Wales in 2005 under Labour only 8% of homes went down a band and in Cardiff – the largest city in Wales – saw over 64% of properties go up at least one band.
If revaluation took place in Scotland those moving from band D to E would pay on average £250 more, and those going from band D to F paying on average £500 more.
According to Labour's Michael McMahon such a new tax is 'desirable'. SNP MSP Joe FitzPatrick - a member of the Scottish Parliament's Finance Committee - said that any new property tax, as part of Labour's 'basket of taxes' would cause misery based on what happened
in Wales and branded their plans a son-of-council-tax.
Commenting Mr FitzPatrick said:
"Labour have already said they will make Scots pay for the mess they created by ratcheting up the Council Tax. It went up 60% - or £430 – the last time they were in power and if they gain power again it could go up by £172 over the four year term of an Iain Gray administration.
“This already comes on top of their ‘basket of taxes’ which would require £3000 more in taxation to pay for their £1.7 billion of new and extra spending promises. And that’s even before the cuts to our budget by the Tory/LibDem government are taken into account.
“Now they want to ratchet up the taxes on ordinary hard working Scots even more by committing to continue with an unfair tax system that takes no account of income. Some ordinary families presently in Band D could see their tax bills increase by as much as £500!
“Michael McMahon's firm commitment to a new property tax will require a revaluation which will only exacerbate the problems Scots are facing as we face the cuts Labour caused and the Tory/LibDem government are imposing. He wants ordinary Scots to pay for the mess Labour created.
"In Labour's 2005 council tax revaluation in Wales, four times as many homes moved up one or more bands as down and if that were replicated in Scotland 750,000 households would be hit by this son-of-council-tax.
“And it could be worse in Glasgow – Scotland’s largest city. In the largest city of Wales, Cardiff, over 64% of Council Tax payers faced increased bills because they went up by at least one band.
“This news will horrify hard pressed households across Scotland and puts council tax at the heart of next year’s election. That Michael McMahon thinks such a situation is 'desirable is appalling!”
ENDS
Notes:
1. The section of Michael McMahon's speech where he announces Labour's firm commitment to a new property tax.
http://www.scottishlabour.org.uk/speech-to-scottish-conference-by-michael-mcmahon
The Domestic Taxation Working Group I have been chairing is finalising its report.
It will take account of the proposals announced in the recent Westminster Spending Review, it will take account of the 10% cut in Council Tax Benefit the ConDems have imposed and we are now waiting for the Scottish Government to publish the Scottish budget to see the full extent of the government cuts.
We will come forward with our proposals when we know that we can deliver them - unlike the SNP, who can’t seem to make a promise without breaking it.
Let me also be clear, though, that Scottish Labour remains committed to the principle of a property based tax.
Property based taxation works and is desirable, as it provides stability, predictable yield and is easy to collect.
Furthermore, ability to pay should relate to overall wealth, not just income and a property based tax is a reasonable indicator of wealth.
2. A report on Labour's revaluation in Wales:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/3136302.stm
3. In Cardiff the following proportions of households went up by one band or more:
50% went up 1 band
13.3% went up 2 bands
0.8% went up 3 bands or more
4. Under Labour Council Tax increased from £708 to £1,138 – a £430 over 10 years.
As Labour has said they will let Council Tax increase again this equates to £172 over a four year Scottish administration.
About Me
- Bonnyrigg and Loanhead SNP
- Bonnyrigg, Loanhead and District Branch is responsible for SNP activity in the Midlothian Council Bonnyrigg and Midlothian West Council wards. The branch have two sitting Councillors, Cllr Bob Constable (Bonnyrigg) and Cllr Owen Thompson (Midlothian West)
Sunday, 7 November 2010
Friday, 5 November 2010
SOMERVILLE COMMENTS ON BILFINGER BERGER LITIGATION THREAT
For Immediate Release – Friday 5 November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
TRANSPORT / POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
Lothians SNP MSP Shirley-Anne Somerville has criticised as entirely
unhelpful Bilfinger Berger threats of legal action against Dave
Mackay, as the company’s relationship with TIE looks to have reached a
new low.
The MSP also argues that the latest development in the trams saga
further strengthens her calls for the Scottish Parliament to
intervene.
With Bilfinger Berger’s description of the project contrasting starkly
with that of David Mackay and TIE, the MSP believes only Parliamentary
scrutiny can allow decision makers and members of the public a chance
to establish the true facts of
the current state of the trams project.
Earlier this week Ms Somerville sent a written request for a probe to
Transport Committee Convenor, Patrick Harvie MSP. Mr Harvie has
indicated that the Committee could discuss the request at its next
meeting when it considers its work programme.
Ms Somerville said:
“This threat is entirely unhelpful. I really do not see what Bilfinger
Berger hope to achieve with this threat. If anything, it will do more
damage to their reputation than anything David Mackay said.
“They should concentrate on sitting down and finding a solution to the
problem. On the other hand at least we have their side of the story
for the first time – and they give a very different explanation of how
the relationship between TIE and the contractor has broken down.
“Once again this illustrates the need for the Scottish Parliament to
intervene. We will never get to the facts if the debate continues to
consist simply of TIE spin together with arbitrations clouded in
secrecy. No one can seriously argue that TIE and Bilfinger should be
left alone to get on with things.
“I have called on the Parliament’s Transport committee to review the
situation. I hope opposition politicians who voted through the trams
will now step up to the challenge of sorting out this mess”.
ENDS
Attn: NEWSDESKS
TRANSPORT / POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
Lothians SNP MSP Shirley-Anne Somerville has criticised as entirely
unhelpful Bilfinger Berger threats of legal action against Dave
Mackay, as the company’s relationship with TIE looks to have reached a
new low.
The MSP also argues that the latest development in the trams saga
further strengthens her calls for the Scottish Parliament to
intervene.
With Bilfinger Berger’s description of the project contrasting starkly
with that of David Mackay and TIE, the MSP believes only Parliamentary
scrutiny can allow decision makers and members of the public a chance
to establish the true facts of
the current state of the trams project.
Earlier this week Ms Somerville sent a written request for a probe to
Transport Committee Convenor, Patrick Harvie MSP. Mr Harvie has
indicated that the Committee could discuss the request at its next
meeting when it considers its work programme.
Ms Somerville said:
“This threat is entirely unhelpful. I really do not see what Bilfinger
Berger hope to achieve with this threat. If anything, it will do more
damage to their reputation than anything David Mackay said.
“They should concentrate on sitting down and finding a solution to the
problem. On the other hand at least we have their side of the story
for the first time – and they give a very different explanation of how
the relationship between TIE and the contractor has broken down.
“Once again this illustrates the need for the Scottish Parliament to
intervene. We will never get to the facts if the debate continues to
consist simply of TIE spin together with arbitrations clouded in
secrecy. No one can seriously argue that TIE and Bilfinger should be
left alone to get on with things.
“I have called on the Parliament’s Transport committee to review the
situation. I hope opposition politicians who voted through the trams
will now step up to the challenge of sorting out this mess”.
ENDS
UK GOVERNMENT MISSES 6-MONTH DEADLINE FOR SCOTTISH ELECTIONS
Embargoed:0001 Friday 5th November 2010
Attn: NEWS DESKS
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
SCOTTISH SECRETARY QUIZZED ON FAILURE TO HIT DEADLINE
With just six months until the Scottish Parliament election on 5 May 2011,SNP MP Angus MacNeil has today written to the Secretary of State for Scotland, Michael Moore, expressing concern that the Government has failed to meet one of the key recommendations of the Gould report into the 2007 Scottish elections.
Professor Ron Gould recommended that no changes to electoral law be made less than six months before an election and that elections to different tiers of government take place on different days. Despite this, both the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill and the Scottish Parliament (Elections etc.) Order 2010 have yet to be finalised.
Mr Gould was highly critical of the problems that arose because of the passing of 'unduly delayed' electoral legislation. The Gould report recommended that electoral legislation should not be applied to any election held within six months of the new provision coming into force.
The two bits of legislation covering the polls on 5 May 2011 fall foul of that recommendation from today.
The Electoral Commission has previously expressed concern over the problems caused by the late passage of primary and secondary electoral legislation, and agreed that a six month 'cut off' provision should be introduced as the Gould report recommends.
Commenting, Mr MacNeil said:
"Not only are we to have two elections in one day, but electoral administrators are again to be left with the impossible task of implementing new legislation in an impossible timescale. The coalition government is making a mockery of the Gould report.
"Much of the confusion around the 2007 poll stemmed from poor decisions made in the Scotland Office. Professor Gould compiled his report to ensure such mistakes were not made again. However, the Scottish Secretary seems hell bent on delivering a Lib Dem vanity project regardless of the impact on democracy in Scotland.
"The governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland were united against the plan of combining the polls on 5 May 2011, but the Lib Dem /Tory Coalition carried on regardless. This is a government that is just not listening.
"The Scotland Office has roundly ignored the recommendation to have elections to different tiers of government on different days and they have totally disregarded the call to leave electoral legislation alone six months in advance of the poll. This is a recipe for disaster."
ENDS
Notes:
1) The text of Mr MacNeil's letter can be found below:
Dear Michael
You will be aware that the Scottish Parliament elections will take place six months from today. Noting this, I write to you to express my concern that the Government has failed to finalise the Scottish Parliament (Elections etc.) Order 2010 within 6 months of the poll.
By doing so, the Scotland Office and the UK Government are going against the independent advice issued by Professor Ron Gould in his 2007 report into the Holyrood elections.
In his review, Professor Gould expressed concern that the late passage of legislation affecting elections created confusion and called for a six month cut off for new legislation before an election. This is a concern shared by the Electoral Commission. We are now at that stage however the changes the UK Government are proposing are still not in place.
I am sure you will be as keen as I am to ensure the successful staging of election for the upcoming Holyrood poll, particularly after the difficulties encountered in 2007. I am deeply concerned that this late legislation could have an adverse affect on the election. Can you confirm this is still your intention to proceed and, if so, will you raise the concerns expressed by Prof Gould and the Electoral Commission at the next meeting of Cabinet?
Yours sincerely,
Angus MacNeil MP
2) The Gould report recommendations can be found here:
http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/electoral_commission_pdf_file/0011/13223/Scottish-Election-Report-A-Final-For-Web.pdf
3) The Electoral Commission response to the Gould report is here:
http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/56095/Final-EC-Response-To-Gould-Report-20071127.pdf
Attn: NEWS DESKS
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
SCOTTISH SECRETARY QUIZZED ON FAILURE TO HIT DEADLINE
With just six months until the Scottish Parliament election on 5 May 2011,SNP MP Angus MacNeil has today written to the Secretary of State for Scotland, Michael Moore, expressing concern that the Government has failed to meet one of the key recommendations of the Gould report into the 2007 Scottish elections.
Professor Ron Gould recommended that no changes to electoral law be made less than six months before an election and that elections to different tiers of government take place on different days. Despite this, both the Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill and the Scottish Parliament (Elections etc.) Order 2010 have yet to be finalised.
Mr Gould was highly critical of the problems that arose because of the passing of 'unduly delayed' electoral legislation. The Gould report recommended that electoral legislation should not be applied to any election held within six months of the new provision coming into force.
The two bits of legislation covering the polls on 5 May 2011 fall foul of that recommendation from today.
The Electoral Commission has previously expressed concern over the problems caused by the late passage of primary and secondary electoral legislation, and agreed that a six month 'cut off' provision should be introduced as the Gould report recommends.
Commenting, Mr MacNeil said:
"Not only are we to have two elections in one day, but electoral administrators are again to be left with the impossible task of implementing new legislation in an impossible timescale. The coalition government is making a mockery of the Gould report.
"Much of the confusion around the 2007 poll stemmed from poor decisions made in the Scotland Office. Professor Gould compiled his report to ensure such mistakes were not made again. However, the Scottish Secretary seems hell bent on delivering a Lib Dem vanity project regardless of the impact on democracy in Scotland.
"The governments of Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland were united against the plan of combining the polls on 5 May 2011, but the Lib Dem /Tory Coalition carried on regardless. This is a government that is just not listening.
"The Scotland Office has roundly ignored the recommendation to have elections to different tiers of government on different days and they have totally disregarded the call to leave electoral legislation alone six months in advance of the poll. This is a recipe for disaster."
ENDS
Notes:
1) The text of Mr MacNeil's letter can be found below:
Dear Michael
You will be aware that the Scottish Parliament elections will take place six months from today. Noting this, I write to you to express my concern that the Government has failed to finalise the Scottish Parliament (Elections etc.) Order 2010 within 6 months of the poll.
By doing so, the Scotland Office and the UK Government are going against the independent advice issued by Professor Ron Gould in his 2007 report into the Holyrood elections.
In his review, Professor Gould expressed concern that the late passage of legislation affecting elections created confusion and called for a six month cut off for new legislation before an election. This is a concern shared by the Electoral Commission. We are now at that stage however the changes the UK Government are proposing are still not in place.
I am sure you will be as keen as I am to ensure the successful staging of election for the upcoming Holyrood poll, particularly after the difficulties encountered in 2007. I am deeply concerned that this late legislation could have an adverse affect on the election. Can you confirm this is still your intention to proceed and, if so, will you raise the concerns expressed by Prof Gould and the Electoral Commission at the next meeting of Cabinet?
Yours sincerely,
Angus MacNeil MP
2) The Gould report recommendations can be found here:
http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/electoral_commission_pdf_file/0011/13223/Scottish-Election-Report-A-Final-For-Web.pdf
3) The Electoral Commission response to the Gould report is here:
http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/56095/Final-EC-Response-To-Gould-Report-20071127.pdf
Thursday, 4 November 2010
UK RECLAIM SCOTTISH CASH
For immediate use: Thursday 4th November
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
TREASURY MOVE VINDICATES SNP FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
The SNP today lodged a series of parliamentary questions regarding the Conservative and Lib Dem Government’s decision to end access to End Year Flexibility (EYF) – the ability to carry any unspent resources by the Scottish Government from one year into the next.
The previous Labour administration hoarded money in EYF for pre-election spending splurges instead of investing in jobs and communities. Under the SNP budget management has improved to ensure Scottish resources held by the Treasury are as low as possible. Finance Secretary John Swinney today confirmed in a Parliamentary debate that the Treasury is ending EYF.
SNP MSP and Finance Committee member Joe FitzPatrick and SNP MP and Treasury Select committee member Stewart Hosie have lodged questions to discover whether the Con-Dem government consulted with the Scottish Government, whether alternative arrangements are to be put in place and if access will be allowed to any money currently held in EYF.
Mr FitzPatrick said:
“It seems not content with cutting Scotland’s budget the Con-Dem coalition wishes to reclaim Scottish money.
“This exposes Labour’s ridiculous idea that the SNP should have banked money with the UK Government. If we had followed Labour’s approach hundreds of millions would now be being reclaimed by the UK Government and taken away from investment in the Scottish people.
“Thankfully under the SNP Scotland’s financial management has improved and we do not have the hundreds of millions Labour failed to invest in Scottish jobs or Scottish families stored up for the Tories and Lib Dems to confiscate to cut Labour’s deficit.
“The ludicrous situation of having another administration control Scotland’s finances is shown up by this change to EYF. The Scottish Parliament and Government are not simply a Government department but with this decision it is clear that that is how the new Government intends to behave.
“It is only with the responsibility to properly control Scotland’s finances and grow our economy that we will be able to get out of this ridiculous situation with the UK Government and generate the economic growth we need to build the better Scotland we all want to see.”
ENDS
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
TREASURY MOVE VINDICATES SNP FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
The SNP today lodged a series of parliamentary questions regarding the Conservative and Lib Dem Government’s decision to end access to End Year Flexibility (EYF) – the ability to carry any unspent resources by the Scottish Government from one year into the next.
The previous Labour administration hoarded money in EYF for pre-election spending splurges instead of investing in jobs and communities. Under the SNP budget management has improved to ensure Scottish resources held by the Treasury are as low as possible. Finance Secretary John Swinney today confirmed in a Parliamentary debate that the Treasury is ending EYF.
SNP MSP and Finance Committee member Joe FitzPatrick and SNP MP and Treasury Select committee member Stewart Hosie have lodged questions to discover whether the Con-Dem government consulted with the Scottish Government, whether alternative arrangements are to be put in place and if access will be allowed to any money currently held in EYF.
Mr FitzPatrick said:
“It seems not content with cutting Scotland’s budget the Con-Dem coalition wishes to reclaim Scottish money.
“This exposes Labour’s ridiculous idea that the SNP should have banked money with the UK Government. If we had followed Labour’s approach hundreds of millions would now be being reclaimed by the UK Government and taken away from investment in the Scottish people.
“Thankfully under the SNP Scotland’s financial management has improved and we do not have the hundreds of millions Labour failed to invest in Scottish jobs or Scottish families stored up for the Tories and Lib Dems to confiscate to cut Labour’s deficit.
“The ludicrous situation of having another administration control Scotland’s finances is shown up by this change to EYF. The Scottish Parliament and Government are not simply a Government department but with this decision it is clear that that is how the new Government intends to behave.
“It is only with the responsibility to properly control Scotland’s finances and grow our economy that we will be able to get out of this ridiculous situation with the UK Government and generate the economic growth we need to build the better Scotland we all want to see.”
ENDS
Wednesday, 3 November 2010
LABOUR & LIBDEMS HAVE QUESTIONS TO ANSWER OVER WASTED £33 MILLION
For immediate use: Wednesday 3rd November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENTS
AUDIT SCOTLAND BACKS MSP’s CONCERNS OVER CONCESSIONARY TRAVEL SCHEME
As the Scottish Parliament’s Public Audit Committee considers a hard-hitting report by Audit Scotland about the national concessionary fare scheme, committee member and SNP MSP for Kilmarnock and Loudoun, Willie Coffey, has expressed concern at the potential for bus companies to overcharge the Scottish Government for journeys made under the scheme.
The national concessionary fare scheme was introduced in 2006 and in a hard-hitting report, Audit Scotland has backed concerns Willie Coffey raised on behalf of constituents and highlighted weaknesses in the way the scheme was introduced by the Labour-led Executive.
Audit Scotland found that, although the scheme is popular, with 80% of over-60s in Scotland holding a bus pass, there were weaknesses in how the scheme was planned and implemented.
The cost of the technology on which the scheme runs has increased from £9 million to £42 million, and is four and a half years behind schedule. Audit Scotland found the contract arrangements for the delivery of the technology to be ‘weak’.
The report also revealed that adult single fares, which are used as the basis for the concessionary travel scheme, have increased on average 6.25% a year since the scheme was introduced.
The Scottish Government and the bus companies agreed that, from April 2010, the rate of reimbursement for concessionary fares will reduce from 73.6% of the adult single fare to 67%.
The parliament’s Public Audit Committee will consider the report at its meeting today (3 November).
Commenting Public Audit Committee member, Willie Coffey, said:
“The national concessionary fare scheme is a lifeline for many pensioners and disabled people and I was concerned when a number of constituents approached me about what they felt were flaws in the scheme’s administration.
“Now, having read the Auditor’s report, I am shocked at how badly the then Labour/LibDem Executive handled the introduction of the scheme, with the requirements of the Scottish Public Finance Manual being ignored in the process.
“I am pleased to see that the scheme is now being brought under control, with a new charging regime in place and less opportunity for error and fraud.
“But this report leaves Labour and the LibDems with a lot of questions to answer; why no effective systems were put in place to administer the scheme when it started, leaving it open to error and fraud, and why the technology took four and a half years longer than planned and cost more than four times the original budget.”
ENDS
Notes
Audit Scotland’s report on National Concessionary Travel can be found here:
http://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/media/article.php?id=154
Attn: NEWSDESKS
TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENTS
AUDIT SCOTLAND BACKS MSP’s CONCERNS OVER CONCESSIONARY TRAVEL SCHEME
As the Scottish Parliament’s Public Audit Committee considers a hard-hitting report by Audit Scotland about the national concessionary fare scheme, committee member and SNP MSP for Kilmarnock and Loudoun, Willie Coffey, has expressed concern at the potential for bus companies to overcharge the Scottish Government for journeys made under the scheme.
The national concessionary fare scheme was introduced in 2006 and in a hard-hitting report, Audit Scotland has backed concerns Willie Coffey raised on behalf of constituents and highlighted weaknesses in the way the scheme was introduced by the Labour-led Executive.
Audit Scotland found that, although the scheme is popular, with 80% of over-60s in Scotland holding a bus pass, there were weaknesses in how the scheme was planned and implemented.
The cost of the technology on which the scheme runs has increased from £9 million to £42 million, and is four and a half years behind schedule. Audit Scotland found the contract arrangements for the delivery of the technology to be ‘weak’.
The report also revealed that adult single fares, which are used as the basis for the concessionary travel scheme, have increased on average 6.25% a year since the scheme was introduced.
The Scottish Government and the bus companies agreed that, from April 2010, the rate of reimbursement for concessionary fares will reduce from 73.6% of the adult single fare to 67%.
The parliament’s Public Audit Committee will consider the report at its meeting today (3 November).
Commenting Public Audit Committee member, Willie Coffey, said:
“The national concessionary fare scheme is a lifeline for many pensioners and disabled people and I was concerned when a number of constituents approached me about what they felt were flaws in the scheme’s administration.
“Now, having read the Auditor’s report, I am shocked at how badly the then Labour/LibDem Executive handled the introduction of the scheme, with the requirements of the Scottish Public Finance Manual being ignored in the process.
“I am pleased to see that the scheme is now being brought under control, with a new charging regime in place and less opportunity for error and fraud.
“But this report leaves Labour and the LibDems with a lot of questions to answer; why no effective systems were put in place to administer the scheme when it started, leaving it open to error and fraud, and why the technology took four and a half years longer than planned and cost more than four times the original budget.”
ENDS
Notes
Audit Scotland’s report on National Concessionary Travel can be found here:
http://www.audit-scotland.gov.uk/media/article.php?id=154
MSP TO HIGHLIGHT IMPORTANCE OF PEATLAND
For immediate use: Wednesday 3rd November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
ENVIRONMENT CORRESPONDENTS
Highlands and Islands SNP MSP will call for peatlands to be considered as important as rainforests during a member’s debate on peatlands in the Scottish Parliament this week (Thursday 4th November).
Mr Gibson, who has secured a members debate on the subject, will say that peatlands are important features which help create and support a rich bio-diversity and lock away carbon.
He will say that more peatlands in Scotland should be returned to their natural state and that they should be protected.
Mr Gibson will also reiterate the call for the flow country in Caithness and North Sutherland (the largest Blanket Peat bog in Europe) to be given world heritage status.
Commenting Mr Gibson said:
"I am delighted to secure the debate which has received cross party support. It shows the importance of the subject and the potential that exists in Scotland's peat bogs."
"Scotland’s deepest peat's store around ten times the amount of carbon stored in the whole of the UK’s forest. A loss of just 1% of Scotland’s peat would equal the annual greenhouse gas emissions of around 57 Megatonnes CO2-equivalent. So restoring damaged peatlands has great potential to help reduce emissions and contribute to Scotland climate change targets."
"Peatlands are the equivalent of the rain forest in the Northern hemisphere and a large proportion of the them are in Scotland. We should ensure that land managers who help maintain this vital part of our natural environment are supported for their efforts in securing a wide range of valuable services.
“We must also take urgent steps to prevent our damaged peatlands from deteriorating so far that they become very difficult to repair."
ENDS
Notes
1. Copy of motion which will be debated in Parliament this Thursday (4th November)
S3M-6931# Rob Gibson: Investing in the Future of Scotland’s Peatlands—That the Parliament welcomes the launch of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) UK Peatland Programme and Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands with funding from the Peter De Haan Charitable Trust and believes that IUCN UK’s decision to base this prestigious programme in Scotland is recognition of the global significance of Scotland’s peatlands and underlines that Scotland leads the world in peatland restoration expertise; considers that, while scientific understanding of peatlands is developing rapidly, the knowledge base is strong enough to recognise that peatlands deliver multiple benefits for biodiversity, water and climate and that the example of the Flow Country of Caithness and Sutherland shows how peatlands can deliver significant economic benefits to local communities through encouraging visitors to these beautiful and fragile landscapes; believes that the land use strategy required by the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 provides an opportunity for peatland restoration to be championed at the heart of government, and further believes that action taken now could prevent massive future costs arising from the breakdown of peatland ecosystems and that target-based peatland restoration offers an important opportunity to help meet Scotland’s climate change targets.
The Debate will take place around 17.10 in parliament on Thursday evening, 4th November.
Attn: NEWSDESKS
ENVIRONMENT CORRESPONDENTS
Highlands and Islands SNP MSP will call for peatlands to be considered as important as rainforests during a member’s debate on peatlands in the Scottish Parliament this week (Thursday 4th November).
Mr Gibson, who has secured a members debate on the subject, will say that peatlands are important features which help create and support a rich bio-diversity and lock away carbon.
He will say that more peatlands in Scotland should be returned to their natural state and that they should be protected.
Mr Gibson will also reiterate the call for the flow country in Caithness and North Sutherland (the largest Blanket Peat bog in Europe) to be given world heritage status.
Commenting Mr Gibson said:
"I am delighted to secure the debate which has received cross party support. It shows the importance of the subject and the potential that exists in Scotland's peat bogs."
"Scotland’s deepest peat's store around ten times the amount of carbon stored in the whole of the UK’s forest. A loss of just 1% of Scotland’s peat would equal the annual greenhouse gas emissions of around 57 Megatonnes CO2-equivalent. So restoring damaged peatlands has great potential to help reduce emissions and contribute to Scotland climate change targets."
"Peatlands are the equivalent of the rain forest in the Northern hemisphere and a large proportion of the them are in Scotland. We should ensure that land managers who help maintain this vital part of our natural environment are supported for their efforts in securing a wide range of valuable services.
“We must also take urgent steps to prevent our damaged peatlands from deteriorating so far that they become very difficult to repair."
ENDS
Notes
1. Copy of motion which will be debated in Parliament this Thursday (4th November)
S3M-6931# Rob Gibson: Investing in the Future of Scotland’s Peatlands—That the Parliament welcomes the launch of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) UK Peatland Programme and Commission of Inquiry on Peatlands with funding from the Peter De Haan Charitable Trust and believes that IUCN UK’s decision to base this prestigious programme in Scotland is recognition of the global significance of Scotland’s peatlands and underlines that Scotland leads the world in peatland restoration expertise; considers that, while scientific understanding of peatlands is developing rapidly, the knowledge base is strong enough to recognise that peatlands deliver multiple benefits for biodiversity, water and climate and that the example of the Flow Country of Caithness and Sutherland shows how peatlands can deliver significant economic benefits to local communities through encouraging visitors to these beautiful and fragile landscapes; believes that the land use strategy required by the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 provides an opportunity for peatland restoration to be championed at the heart of government, and further believes that action taken now could prevent massive future costs arising from the breakdown of peatland ecosystems and that target-based peatland restoration offers an important opportunity to help meet Scotland’s climate change targets.
The Debate will take place around 17.10 in parliament on Thursday evening, 4th November.
EDINBURGH TRAMS – MACKAY RESIGNATION CONFIRMS PROJECT IN CHAOS FROM THE START
For immediate use: Wednesday 3rd November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL / TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENTS
SOMERVILLE DEMANDS TIE AND TRANSPORT CONVENER ANSWER PARLIAMENT QUESTIONS
Commenting on the resignation of Tram Chairman David MacKay and his description of the project as “hell on wheels” SNP MSP for Lothians Shirley Anne Somerville said his comments showed the project had been in chaos from the start. David MacKay points to Labour’s Iain Gray, Lib Dem leader Tavish Scott and the Labour Councillors in control in 2005 as rushing the project to prevent the SNP putting a stop to it.
Ms Somerville has asked the Scottish Parliament’s Transport Committee of which she is a member to call the councillor responsible for the project –Lib Dem Gordon MacKenzie –and Tram Chief Executive Richard Jeffries to answer questions on the problems facing the scheme at the earliest possible opportunity.
Ms Somerville said:
“If David MacKay’s resignation reflects the state of negotiations with the contractors then this city could be facing real problems.
“If someone with his experience cannot tough these negotiations out what does it say for the future. Does his departure mean the contractors are winning?
“It is time those responsible came to Parliament and answered to the people of Edinburgh.
“David MacKay has blown the cover of those Labour, Lib Dem and Tory politicians who have hidden the truth from the people of Edinburgh for the last five years.
“Today's developments confirm the SNP’s warnings that the tram project was being pushed for political not practical reasons. There was clearly chaos in the project from as early as 2005 yet Labour, Lib Dem and Tory determined to push ahead and TIE told the city and the Parliament
everything was fine.
“Sacking contractors without resolving disputes will only cost this city more. This whole project has been hindered by the failure of its supporters to answer questions and put the truth to the people of Edinburgh. That must be the priority.
“The SNP warned our political opponents that forcing the Scottish Government to implement this project would lead to funding problems and chaos for people in Edinburgh. It is deeply unfortunate that with David MacKay’s resignation we are seeing our worst fears realised."
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL / TRANSPORT CORRESPONDENTS
SOMERVILLE DEMANDS TIE AND TRANSPORT CONVENER ANSWER PARLIAMENT QUESTIONS
Commenting on the resignation of Tram Chairman David MacKay and his description of the project as “hell on wheels” SNP MSP for Lothians Shirley Anne Somerville said his comments showed the project had been in chaos from the start. David MacKay points to Labour’s Iain Gray, Lib Dem leader Tavish Scott and the Labour Councillors in control in 2005 as rushing the project to prevent the SNP putting a stop to it.
Ms Somerville has asked the Scottish Parliament’s Transport Committee of which she is a member to call the councillor responsible for the project –Lib Dem Gordon MacKenzie –and Tram Chief Executive Richard Jeffries to answer questions on the problems facing the scheme at the earliest possible opportunity.
Ms Somerville said:
“If David MacKay’s resignation reflects the state of negotiations with the contractors then this city could be facing real problems.
“If someone with his experience cannot tough these negotiations out what does it say for the future. Does his departure mean the contractors are winning?
“It is time those responsible came to Parliament and answered to the people of Edinburgh.
“David MacKay has blown the cover of those Labour, Lib Dem and Tory politicians who have hidden the truth from the people of Edinburgh for the last five years.
“Today's developments confirm the SNP’s warnings that the tram project was being pushed for political not practical reasons. There was clearly chaos in the project from as early as 2005 yet Labour, Lib Dem and Tory determined to push ahead and TIE told the city and the Parliament
everything was fine.
“Sacking contractors without resolving disputes will only cost this city more. This whole project has been hindered by the failure of its supporters to answer questions and put the truth to the people of Edinburgh. That must be the priority.
“The SNP warned our political opponents that forcing the Scottish Government to implement this project would lead to funding problems and chaos for people in Edinburgh. It is deeply unfortunate that with David MacKay’s resignation we are seeing our worst fears realised."
Tuesday, 2 November 2010
CLARITY CALL IN POST OFFICE DEBATE
For immediate use: Tuesday 2 November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
Speaking in a debate on the future of the Post Office network today
(Tuesday) SNP Business and Enterprise spokesperson Mike Weir MP warned that Royal Mail privatisation plans threatened the future of post offices and postal services and called for clarity over mutualisation proposals.
Mr Weir also urged UK Ministers to follow the lead of the Scottish Government, highlighting the business bonus scheme which provides rates relief and the Post Office diversification fund, as concrete examples of how relatively small sums of money can be utilised to help strengthen the post office network.
Speaking after the debate, Mr Weir said:
“The post office plays a vital part in the life of local communities, and the UK government needs to follow the lead of the Scottish Government and do much more to secure the future of the network in challenging times.
“While the UK government claims that there will be no more closure programmes, the fact is that the current privatisation plans threaten the future of deliveries, jobs and services.
“We need clarity from Ministers over the implications that the Postal Services Bill will have for the network and how, for example, plans for mutualism will work.
“With so many Post Offices interlinked with other businesses, for example, located in branches of supermarkets or newsagents, it is difficult to see how this diverse structure can easily work as a mutual organisation.
“The UK Government should follow the lead of the Scottish Government who are doing what they can to support the network through initiatives like the business bonus scheme to provide rates relief and the Post Office diversification fund. These are concrete examples of how relatively small sums of money can be utilised to help strengthen the post office network.”
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
Speaking in a debate on the future of the Post Office network today
(Tuesday) SNP Business and Enterprise spokesperson Mike Weir MP warned that Royal Mail privatisation plans threatened the future of post offices and postal services and called for clarity over mutualisation proposals.
Mr Weir also urged UK Ministers to follow the lead of the Scottish Government, highlighting the business bonus scheme which provides rates relief and the Post Office diversification fund, as concrete examples of how relatively small sums of money can be utilised to help strengthen the post office network.
Speaking after the debate, Mr Weir said:
“The post office plays a vital part in the life of local communities, and the UK government needs to follow the lead of the Scottish Government and do much more to secure the future of the network in challenging times.
“While the UK government claims that there will be no more closure programmes, the fact is that the current privatisation plans threaten the future of deliveries, jobs and services.
“We need clarity from Ministers over the implications that the Postal Services Bill will have for the network and how, for example, plans for mutualism will work.
“With so many Post Offices interlinked with other businesses, for example, located in branches of supermarkets or newsagents, it is difficult to see how this diverse structure can easily work as a mutual organisation.
“The UK Government should follow the lead of the Scottish Government who are doing what they can to support the network through initiatives like the business bonus scheme to provide rates relief and the Post Office diversification fund. These are concrete examples of how relatively small sums of money can be utilised to help strengthen the post office network.”
FIFE AND WESTERN ISLES WELCOME WIND FARM CONTRACT
For immediate use: Tuesday 2nd November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
ECONOMY / ENERGY CORRESPONDENTS
Local MSPs Tricia Marwick (Central Fife) and Alasdair Allan (Western Isles) have welcomed the announcement that Burntisland Fabrications has won the contract to build foundation structures for an off shore wind farm in Wales securing 390 jobs across the two sites.
Ms Marwick, who represents BiFab plant at Methil said:
“This is fantastic news for BiFab and for the people of Levenmouth. Fife is fast developing a worldwide reputation in the renewable industry for our manufacturing abilities.
“This £12 million contract will secure employment for 350 staff and is a huge boost for the local area. Methil has the off-shore energy expertise and has now become a centre for the renewable energy sector in Scotland.
“The Scottish Government has provided significant support to Bi-Fab and Fife Energy Park over the last few years and I am delighted that this investment is now paying off.”
“With more investment in renewables on the way Fife is perfectly placed to reap the benefits of Scotland’s renewables revolution.”
Western Isles MSP Alasdair Allan welcomed the news which secures 40 jobs at Arnish on the Isle of Lewis.
“This is further positive news for Arnish and safeguards 40 jobs.
I continue to be impressed by the ability of Arnish to develop in new directions and to make a major contribution to the economy of the island. T
“The development of a pile manufacturing plant at Arnish stands the facility in good stead for the future.”
“This is great news for the islands and shows the benefits the green economy can bring to all parts of Scotland.
Attn: NEWSDESKS
ECONOMY / ENERGY CORRESPONDENTS
Local MSPs Tricia Marwick (Central Fife) and Alasdair Allan (Western Isles) have welcomed the announcement that Burntisland Fabrications has won the contract to build foundation structures for an off shore wind farm in Wales securing 390 jobs across the two sites.
Ms Marwick, who represents BiFab plant at Methil said:
“This is fantastic news for BiFab and for the people of Levenmouth. Fife is fast developing a worldwide reputation in the renewable industry for our manufacturing abilities.
“This £12 million contract will secure employment for 350 staff and is a huge boost for the local area. Methil has the off-shore energy expertise and has now become a centre for the renewable energy sector in Scotland.
“The Scottish Government has provided significant support to Bi-Fab and Fife Energy Park over the last few years and I am delighted that this investment is now paying off.”
“With more investment in renewables on the way Fife is perfectly placed to reap the benefits of Scotland’s renewables revolution.”
Western Isles MSP Alasdair Allan welcomed the news which secures 40 jobs at Arnish on the Isle of Lewis.
“This is further positive news for Arnish and safeguards 40 jobs.
I continue to be impressed by the ability of Arnish to develop in new directions and to make a major contribution to the economy of the island. T
“The development of a pile manufacturing plant at Arnish stands the facility in good stead for the future.”
“This is great news for the islands and shows the benefits the green economy can bring to all parts of Scotland.
ALCOHOL ACTION ESSENTIAL IN CRIME FIGHT
For immediate use: Tuesday 2nd November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
JUSTICE /POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
SCOTS FEELING SAFER UNDER SNP
Welcoming the latest survey of perceptions of crime which showed people feel safer and that the risk of being a victim of crime is now lower in Scotland than in England and Wales SNP MSP Stewart Maxwell said the figures showed tackling Scotland’s alcohol problems was the next step in cutting violent crime rates.
The survey shows 62% of victims in cases of violent crime thought the offender had consumed alcohol and 30% of victims had consumed alcohol prior to the crime being committed.
Mr Maxwell, a member of the Scottish Parliament’s Justice committee said:
“We must take serious action to address the problems caused by alcohol in our society.
“With 62% of violent crime taking place under the influence it is clear alcohol consumption is a major factor in crime across Scotland.
“Under the SNP Government crime rates are at a 32 year low and police numbers are at a record high with over 1000 more officers on the street helping to make Scotland safer and to ensure people feel safer in their homes and communities.
“The SNP has taken action to improve safety across all our communities and to crack down on crime but it is clear that changing Scotland’s relationship with alcohol is a key part of cutting crime further.
“Alcohol is never an excuse for crime but we have to recognise that by introducing a minimum price for alcohol we could see the number of violent crimes cut by 400 in the first year alone.
“The error of judgement from opposition parties who continue to reject action on alcohol that could cut crime and save lives is shocking. While
Labour, Lib Dem and Tory block action to make our communities safer and healthier the SNP is working with people across Scotland, communities, police and health professionals to tackle Scotland’s alcohol problems so we can all make Scotland better.
ENDS
1. Nicola Sturgeon to Health Committee 22nd September
“A minimum price of 45p per unit is likely to achieve significant benefits when compared with other interventions, including lower minimum prices.
For example, the health benefits that would likely arise from a 45p minimum price are in many cases double those for a 40p minimum price. In the first year, a 45p minimum price would likely see benefits of 50 fewer deaths from alcohol-related harm; 1,200 fewer hospital admissions; 400 fewer violent crimes; 23,000 fewer days' absence from work; a £5.5 million reduction in health care costs; and a £52 million reduction in total harm in terms of health, crime and employment. After 10 years, those benefits would be expected to increase significantly.”
2. Scottish Crime and Justice Survey, 2009/10
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/11/01090437/7
Figure 3.4 shows:
• In 62% of violent crime measured by the SCJS 2009/10, the victim said the offender(s) was under the influence of alcohol. This was a higher proportion than found in the BCS in England and Wales in 2009/10 where the victim reported that the offender(s) was under the influence of alcohol in 50% of violent crime;
• Victims reported that the offender(s) was under the influence of drugs in just over one in four (26%) violent crimes. Once again this was higher than the equivalent figure from the BCS for England and Wales for the same period (20% of violent crime);
• In three in ten (30%) violent crimes, the victim said that they had consumed alcohol immediately before the incident;
• Victims said they had taken drugs immediately before the incident in one per cent of violent crime.
Attn: NEWSDESKS
JUSTICE /POLITICAL CORRESPONDENTS
SCOTS FEELING SAFER UNDER SNP
Welcoming the latest survey of perceptions of crime which showed people feel safer and that the risk of being a victim of crime is now lower in Scotland than in England and Wales SNP MSP Stewart Maxwell said the figures showed tackling Scotland’s alcohol problems was the next step in cutting violent crime rates.
The survey shows 62% of victims in cases of violent crime thought the offender had consumed alcohol and 30% of victims had consumed alcohol prior to the crime being committed.
Mr Maxwell, a member of the Scottish Parliament’s Justice committee said:
“We must take serious action to address the problems caused by alcohol in our society.
“With 62% of violent crime taking place under the influence it is clear alcohol consumption is a major factor in crime across Scotland.
“Under the SNP Government crime rates are at a 32 year low and police numbers are at a record high with over 1000 more officers on the street helping to make Scotland safer and to ensure people feel safer in their homes and communities.
“The SNP has taken action to improve safety across all our communities and to crack down on crime but it is clear that changing Scotland’s relationship with alcohol is a key part of cutting crime further.
“Alcohol is never an excuse for crime but we have to recognise that by introducing a minimum price for alcohol we could see the number of violent crimes cut by 400 in the first year alone.
“The error of judgement from opposition parties who continue to reject action on alcohol that could cut crime and save lives is shocking. While
Labour, Lib Dem and Tory block action to make our communities safer and healthier the SNP is working with people across Scotland, communities, police and health professionals to tackle Scotland’s alcohol problems so we can all make Scotland better.
ENDS
1. Nicola Sturgeon to Health Committee 22nd September
“A minimum price of 45p per unit is likely to achieve significant benefits when compared with other interventions, including lower minimum prices.
For example, the health benefits that would likely arise from a 45p minimum price are in many cases double those for a 40p minimum price. In the first year, a 45p minimum price would likely see benefits of 50 fewer deaths from alcohol-related harm; 1,200 fewer hospital admissions; 400 fewer violent crimes; 23,000 fewer days' absence from work; a £5.5 million reduction in health care costs; and a £52 million reduction in total harm in terms of health, crime and employment. After 10 years, those benefits would be expected to increase significantly.”
2. Scottish Crime and Justice Survey, 2009/10
http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/11/01090437/7
Figure 3.4 shows:
• In 62% of violent crime measured by the SCJS 2009/10, the victim said the offender(s) was under the influence of alcohol. This was a higher proportion than found in the BCS in England and Wales in 2009/10 where the victim reported that the offender(s) was under the influence of alcohol in 50% of violent crime;
• Victims reported that the offender(s) was under the influence of drugs in just over one in four (26%) violent crimes. Once again this was higher than the equivalent figure from the BCS for England and Wales for the same period (20% of violent crime);
• In three in ten (30%) violent crimes, the victim said that they had consumed alcohol immediately before the incident;
• Victims said they had taken drugs immediately before the incident in one per cent of violent crime.
Monday, 1 November 2010
SECOND POLL SHOWS SIGNIFICANT SNP GAINS
Monday 1st November 2010
ANGUS REID POLL – BRIEFING NOTE
A second poll following SNP conference shows the momentum continues to be with the SNP.
Angus Reid’s commentary states: The big winner in October appears to be the SNP, which made significant gains at the expense of Labour.
While the Angus Reid poll conducted on 27/28 October has only a small sample (179) in Scotland:
• the poll sees the SNP up 17 points on Angus Reid’s final poll in the General Election to draw level with Labour at 37% each
• the Lib Dems are at a new low, polling only 7% around half the level of the Tories in Scotland who are on 13% and three quarters of the level the Lib Dems were at in the General Election.
In contrast to the final Angus Reid poll of the General Election the SNP share of the vote has increased 17 points with Labour staying static. The Lib Dems have fallen by 20 points or nearly three quarters from their General Election high point.
Amongst those who have decided who they will vote for the SNP has a 1 point lead with 33% to Labour’s 32%.
The final Angus Reid poll of the General Election on 5th May showed Labour 37, Lib Dem 27, SNP 20, Con 15
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/43443/labour-keeps-two-point-edge-over-conservatives-in-britain/
ANGUS REID POLL – BRIEFING NOTE
A second poll following SNP conference shows the momentum continues to be with the SNP.
Angus Reid’s commentary states: The big winner in October appears to be the SNP, which made significant gains at the expense of Labour.
While the Angus Reid poll conducted on 27/28 October has only a small sample (179) in Scotland:
• the poll sees the SNP up 17 points on Angus Reid’s final poll in the General Election to draw level with Labour at 37% each
• the Lib Dems are at a new low, polling only 7% around half the level of the Tories in Scotland who are on 13% and three quarters of the level the Lib Dems were at in the General Election.
In contrast to the final Angus Reid poll of the General Election the SNP share of the vote has increased 17 points with Labour staying static. The Lib Dems have fallen by 20 points or nearly three quarters from their General Election high point.
Amongst those who have decided who they will vote for the SNP has a 1 point lead with 33% to Labour’s 32%.
The final Angus Reid poll of the General Election on 5th May showed Labour 37, Lib Dem 27, SNP 20, Con 15
http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/43443/labour-keeps-two-point-edge-over-conservatives-in-britain/
ALCOHOL REPORT EXPOSES OPPOSITION MISJUDGEMENT
For immediate use: Monday 1st November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL / HEALTH CORRESPONDENTS
Following a new report by the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs , the organisation led by former UK Government drugs adviser David Nutt the SNP said it showed the error of judgement made by opposition parties in opposing minimum pricing.
Today’s report places Alcohol above heroin and crack cocaine in terms of the harm it does to society because of the far higher levels of consumption across the country.
The Scottish Parliament will debate the final stage of the Scottish Government’s Alcohol bill later this month. Opposition parties have so far refused to support proposals from the SNP backed by health and justice professionals to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol.
SNP MSP and Health Committee member Michael Matheson said:
“Action to tackle the problems of alcohol in our society is essential.
This problem cannot be ignored.
“Opposition parties have made a significant error of judgement in their refusal to support the introduction of minimum pricing for alcohol.
“With reports now showing the harmful impact of alcohol on society is higher than that of drugs like heroin and cocaine no politician should stop real action being taken.
“The SNP is committed to tackling Scotland's problem with alcohol and to minimum pricing as part of the solution. The alcohol bill put forward by the SNP will end deep discounts and improve controls on alcohol however opposition parties should take this opportunity to reconsider their position and back minimum pricing plans that will help the whole of Scottish society.
“With the deafening silence on alcohol pricing coming from the new Con- Dem coalition and Labour's record of politicising public health demonstrated by their refusal to support minimum pricing and their treatment of Professor Nutt the failure of opposition parties to act risks doing further damage to our health and communities.”
ENDS
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL / HEALTH CORRESPONDENTS
Following a new report by the Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs , the organisation led by former UK Government drugs adviser David Nutt the SNP said it showed the error of judgement made by opposition parties in opposing minimum pricing.
Today’s report places Alcohol above heroin and crack cocaine in terms of the harm it does to society because of the far higher levels of consumption across the country.
The Scottish Parliament will debate the final stage of the Scottish Government’s Alcohol bill later this month. Opposition parties have so far refused to support proposals from the SNP backed by health and justice professionals to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol.
SNP MSP and Health Committee member Michael Matheson said:
“Action to tackle the problems of alcohol in our society is essential.
This problem cannot be ignored.
“Opposition parties have made a significant error of judgement in their refusal to support the introduction of minimum pricing for alcohol.
“With reports now showing the harmful impact of alcohol on society is higher than that of drugs like heroin and cocaine no politician should stop real action being taken.
“The SNP is committed to tackling Scotland's problem with alcohol and to minimum pricing as part of the solution. The alcohol bill put forward by the SNP will end deep discounts and improve controls on alcohol however opposition parties should take this opportunity to reconsider their position and back minimum pricing plans that will help the whole of Scottish society.
“With the deafening silence on alcohol pricing coming from the new Con- Dem coalition and Labour's record of politicising public health demonstrated by their refusal to support minimum pricing and their treatment of Professor Nutt the failure of opposition parties to act risks doing further damage to our health and communities.”
ENDS
LABOUR BLACK HOLE GETS DEEPER
For immediate use: Monday 1st November 2010
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL CORRRESPONDENTS
GRAY AND KERR PUSH TAX BILLS HIGHER
The SNP today said Labour had to explain to the public, not just the civil service, how they propose to fund spending pledges, currently valued at more than £1.7 billion and increasing by the day.
The SNP revealed yesterday that Labour’s election wishlist would cost households £3000 over the next Parliament in new and higher taxes.
Over the weekend Labour added at least a further £90 million to their spending wish list.
Commenting SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson said:
“Iain Gray and Andy Kerr have to explain to the public, not just the civil service, where they are getting the £1.7 billion to fund their election wishlist.
“Labour went into their conference with spending plans that will cost each household in Scotland £3000. That bill is increasing by the minute.
“While the SNP will protect family incomes Labour want to raid families piggy banks.
“Labour cannot hide from their tax raising plans. Iain Gray has already admitted he would hit low paid families and pensioners with a rise to the unfair council tax at the same time as freezing household wages for three years. It is now clear Labour will use the Calman tax and their proposed“basket of taxes” to push household bills higher and higher. That is simply unfair.
“In these tight financial times it is simply irresponsible to set out spending pledges and promises without the slightest attempt to show the public how they would be paid for.
“Not content with damaging the UK’s finances it seems Labour now want to damage the finances of Scotland and Scottish households.
“In contrast the SNP is working responsibility together with people across Scotland to hear their policy priorities and to keep their tax bills down, protecting family incomes.
ENDS
1.Attached details of Labour’s £1.7 billion blackhole.
2. The report of Labour’s Scottish Policy Forum states on page 23:
“Scottish Labour believe that the fairest approach is to have a basket of taxes”
3. Newspaper reports put the cost of new pledges by Iain Gray and Andy Kerr during Labour conference at £90 million.
Attn: NEWSDESKS
POLITICAL CORRRESPONDENTS
GRAY AND KERR PUSH TAX BILLS HIGHER
The SNP today said Labour had to explain to the public, not just the civil service, how they propose to fund spending pledges, currently valued at more than £1.7 billion and increasing by the day.
The SNP revealed yesterday that Labour’s election wishlist would cost households £3000 over the next Parliament in new and higher taxes.
Over the weekend Labour added at least a further £90 million to their spending wish list.
Commenting SNP MSP Kenneth Gibson said:
“Iain Gray and Andy Kerr have to explain to the public, not just the civil service, where they are getting the £1.7 billion to fund their election wishlist.
“Labour went into their conference with spending plans that will cost each household in Scotland £3000. That bill is increasing by the minute.
“While the SNP will protect family incomes Labour want to raid families piggy banks.
“Labour cannot hide from their tax raising plans. Iain Gray has already admitted he would hit low paid families and pensioners with a rise to the unfair council tax at the same time as freezing household wages for three years. It is now clear Labour will use the Calman tax and their proposed“basket of taxes” to push household bills higher and higher. That is simply unfair.
“In these tight financial times it is simply irresponsible to set out spending pledges and promises without the slightest attempt to show the public how they would be paid for.
“Not content with damaging the UK’s finances it seems Labour now want to damage the finances of Scotland and Scottish households.
“In contrast the SNP is working responsibility together with people across Scotland to hear their policy priorities and to keep their tax bills down, protecting family incomes.
ENDS
1.Attached details of Labour’s £1.7 billion blackhole.
2. The report of Labour’s Scottish Policy Forum states on page 23:
“Scottish Labour believe that the fairest approach is to have a basket of taxes”
3. Newspaper reports put the cost of new pledges by Iain Gray and Andy Kerr during Labour conference at £90 million.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)